Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Jumbo Landing

In this International Fund for Animal Welfare public service announcement, an elephant comes in for a landing in the style of a jumbo jet. It's a visually clever way of making the point that travelers should think twice before purchasing souvenirs made from animal products.



If the video does not play or display properly above, click here to view it on YouTube.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

The Language of H1N1 Swine Flu: Virus names and case definitions

H1N1 virusby B .N. Sullivan

The outbreak of H1N1 (swine flu) is continuing and expanding. So is the confusion over what the virus should and should not be called. Confusing as well -- at least to some people -- is the meaning of the terms 'confirmed' case, 'probable' case, and 'suspected' case. Hoping to clear things up a bit, this post addresses current virus naming conventions and official case definitions.

The Name of the Virus

When the current outbreak began, we were informed that the pathogen was the Swine Influenza A/H1N1 virus. That name quickly became colloquialized as Swine Flu. Apparently pork producers and some ethnic groups took umbrage, so authorities in charge of nomenclature for diseases officially declared that we all should use the name H1N1, rather than Swine Flu.

What followed was -- and is -- even more confusing. The World Health Organization (WHO), and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hustled to change the terms Swine Flu and Swine Influenza to H1N1 Influenza in their official communications, and in some cases even changed the URLs of web pages that featured information about the virus and the outbreak. Many news organizations and bloggers followed suit, but the colloquialism, Swine Flu, still seems to persist in conversation, and also on social media like Twitter.

Today I was cruising around on the CDC website looking for various bits of information about the outbreak, and I discovered several pages of official information that used multiple names for the virus on the same page -- and even in the same paragraph.

Now, maybe this is a transitional thing, and maybe it's a sort of SEO attempt: using multiple names so that Google will point to the page regardless of which term is entered in a search. It does, however, boggle the mind to see the virus referred to as Swine Influenza A (H1N1) Virus; Swine-origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus; and S-OIV, in the space of one paragraph.

Actually, I like the S-OIV variant -- and SOIV, without the dang hyphen, would be better still (not that anyone asked my opinion). To my mind, it's easier to say and type than H1N1/A Virus, or what have you . Also, the S-OIV designation distinguishes this novel virus from other H1N1 viruses.

Case Definitions

Now, about that suspected/probable/confirmed progression. Those are not casually used descriptors of cases. They actually have specific meaning to epidemiologists.

According to the CDC's guidance on case definitions:

A suspected case of S-OIV infection is defined as a person with acute febrile respiratory illness with onset

  • within 7 days of close contact with a person who is a confirmed case of S-OIV infection, or
  • within 7 days of travel to community either within the United States or internationally where there are one or more confirmed cases of S-OIV infection, or
  • resides in a community where there are one or more confirmed cases of S-OIV infection.
Translation: If you've been around an infected person or a community where there are confirmed cases, and you develop flu-like symptoms, you are a suspected case.

A probable case of S-OIV infection is defined as "a person with an acute febrile respiratory illness who is positive for influenza A, but negative for H1 and H3 by influenza RT-PCR."

Translation: A lab test, usually done locally, has identified your viral infection as influenza A. You're still only probable for S-OIV, until a more sensitive test (not yet widely available) can pinpoint the exact variant of influenza A that infected you.

A confirmed case of S-OIV infection "is defined as a person with an acute febrile respiratory illness with laboratory confirmed S-OIV infection at CDC by one or more of the following tests: 1) real-time RT-PCR; 2) viral culture."

Translation: Once your local health authorities concluded that you were a probable case, they sent samples of the viral isolates that infected you to the CDC (or another lab approved by the CDC). They then determined that, yep, it's S-OIV.

One can only imagine how busy these labs have been over the past week!

About the Photo: The image of the newly identified H1N1 influenza virus is one of several made available to the public (in several sizes) on the CDC website. The images were taken in the CDC Influenza Laboratory.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Swine Flu Developments: Pandemic Alert Level Raised

by B .N. Sullivan

There have been quite a few developments in the swine flu story since I first wrote about the outbreak here a few days ago. For one thing, more cases have been confirmed in the U.S.; for another, the virus has spread to several other countries, presumably carried by travelers.

As of this afternoon, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had confirmed 40 cases of swine flu in the United States, with many more under investigation. So far there have been no deaths from the disease in the United States, but CDC officials have publicly acknowledged the inevitability of fatalities before the outbreak is finished.

This should not be a surprising statement, given the well known fact that each year, on average, about 36,000 people die from causes related to seasonal flu. The CDC also estimates that 5% to 20% of the U.S. population gets seasonal flu in a given year, and of those, more than 200,000 people are hospitalized from flu-related complications.

Ironically, some media sources have been citing those numbers to argue that we should not be so concerned about swine flu. After all, the reasoning goes, if 36,000 people die from flu each year anyway, what's the big deal?

This is a specious argument, of course, because it ignores the fact that seasonal flu occurs in a population in which a considerable number of people have been vaccinated. Also, there will have been many opportunities for people to be exposed to -- even 'catch' -- 'regular' seasonal flu viruses over a period of years, thus acquiring immune system defenses against them.

In contrast, the Swine Influenza A/H1N1 virus -- the culprit in the current outbreak -- is a novel virus, i.e., never seen before. Therefore, no one has been vaccinated against it (and indeed there is no vaccine against this virus). Furthermore, since it is new, our bodies have not been exposed in a way that would allow our immune systems to build antibodies to defend against infection. In short, we are virtually defenseless against this virus.

Before any readers accuse me of being alarmist, let me say that I am anything but that. I am a scientist, and as such I am accustomed to approaching issues with reason, and drawing inferences based on available data. I eschew rumors, and I read stories in the press with a skeptical eye. I rely on primary sources of information, to the extent they are available. I have concluded that, at the present time, our best defense against swine flu rests solely on avoidance.

The good news, if you want to call it that, is that most cases of swine flu -- at least in the U.S. -- have not been much worse than seasonal flu, in regard to symptoms and suffering. People catch swine flu; they are ill for a number of days; they recover. Let's hope it stays that way.

Two more points:

Today the CDC issued a Travel Health Warning, officially advising travelers to avoid non-essential travel to Mexico, which remains the epicenter of the swine flu outbreak.

The Emergency Committee of the World Health Organization (WHO) met today and raised the level of influenza pandemic alert from the phase 3 to phase 4, indicating that "the likelihood of a pandemic has increased, but not that a pandemic is inevitable."

The WHO statement about the change in the pandemic alert level notes:

This decision was based primarily on epidemiological data demonstrating human-to-human transmission and the ability of the virus to cause community-level outbreaks.

Given the widespread presence of the virus, the Director-General considered that containment of the outbreak is not feasible. The current focus should be on mitigation measures.
The chart below describes the WHO phases of pandemic alert. More info on the WHO website.

WHO Pandemic Phases

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Swine Flu Update: Multi-Media Briefings

There is a lot of good, useful information available about the current outbreak of the Swine Influenza A/H1N1 (swine flu) virus in humans, but there is a lot of questionable and/or sensationalist information circulating as well. Sometimes it's hard to distinguish between the reliable and unreliable versions of the stories.

A good strategy for understanding what's going on is to monitor briefings that agencies like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) provide. Here are a few of those:

CDC Briefing, Apr. 24, 2009



(Click here to view the above video on YouTube.)

Podcasts: Another good way to stay informed about the Swine Flu outbreak is to subscribe to the CDC's Swine Flu RSS feed: Instructions for How to Add the CDC Swine Flu RSS Feed to your reader.

On Twitter, you can get Swine Flu news updates in real time by following @CDCemergency -- or follow @twellness, a health and medical news headline Twitter feed run by yours truly.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Swine Flu: Looming menace or a blip on the epidemiological radar screen?

by B .N. Sullivan

A new kind of influenza virus is infecting people in Mexico, California, and Texas (so far). The virus, called Swine Influenza A/H1N1, began making news just recently, but health officials are intensifying surveillance of the disease for several reasons.

pigAccording to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Swine Flu viruses do not normally infect humans. Human infections have occurred infrequently in the past, and the cases almost always were in people exposed to pigs, e.g., on farms or elsewhere in the livestock industry. A Swine Flu Fact Sheet on the CDC website states:

In the past, CDC received reports of approximately one human swine influenza virus infection every one to two years in the U.S., but from December 2005 through February 2009, 12 cases of human infection with swine influenza have been reported.
Things are changing. As of this afternoon, the CDC has identified eight 'laboratory confirmed' cases of human Swine Flu in the United States: six in California, and two in Texas. The CDC reports today that "no recent exposure to pigs has been identified" for any of the U.S. patients.

That worrying statement was included in a special Dispatch issue of the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). The fact that the MMWR Dispatch even was issued today is an indication of the potential seriousness of the situation, since that medium is reserved for the immediate release of important public health information.

Here is another worrisome point: The World Health Organization (WHO), which also issued a brief report on human Swine Flu infections on its website today, notes, "The Swine Influenza A/H1N1 viruses characterized in this outbreak have not been previously detected in pigs or humans." In other words, these outbreaks appear to be caused by a novel pathogen.

Viruses have a nasty ability to quickly mutate and/or recombine with other similar viruses to create a novel organism. They are moving targets, in a way. That is why the seasonal flu vaccine has to be reformulated every year, for one thing. But there is another reason why this can be problematic.

Over our lifetimes, we are exposed to many different pathogens -- exposures that allow our immune systems to develop defenses against infection. These defenses mitigate the severity of symptoms should we become infected, and in many cases allow us to resist infection completely. But what happens when a novel virus appears? Since there has been no opportunity for us to have encountered it, our immune systems will have developed no defenses against it. That means we may become infected more easily, and that the infection, once established, may be more severe.

When epidemiologists study human infections with 'animal viruses', another important issue to consider is whether or not the virus is easily transmitted from one human to another. Outbreaks of H5N1 Avian Influenza (AKA 'bird flu') in recent years have illustrated that while humans can 'catch' the virus from infected poultry or wild birds, instances of human-to-human transmission of the virus appear to be very rare. Apparently the current outbreaks of Swine Flu suggest a different picture.

Today's MMWR Dispatch, cited above, mentions that two Swine Flu cases identified in San Diego County, CA, were a father and daughter. The onset of their illnesses were just a day apart. The CDC says that two' household contacts' of those patients also developed 'recent mild acute respiratory illnesses' and that specimens from those contacts were being analyzed for evidence of the virus. Family clusters of infectious disease strongly suggest human to human transmission.

The two cases in Guadalupe County, TX, are adolescent boys who attend the same high school in a suburb of San Antonio. Their symptoms developed four days apart, and the viruses that caused their infections were determined to be identical. The fact that they are schoolmates does not mean that they infected each other, or that they were infected by the same source, but it certainly does not militate against such transmission either.

So then, we don't know yet if the Swine Influenza A/H1N1 virus is readily transmissible among humans, but evidence is beginning to suggest that it might be. Some of that evidence comes from Mexico, where the current situation is much worse than in the United States.

Quoting from the WHO web page about the Swine Flu outbreaks, mentioned above (reparagraphed for easier reading):
The Government of Mexico has reported three separate events.

In the Federal District of Mexico, surveillance began picking up cases of ILI [Influenza-Like-Illness] starting 18 March. The number of cases has risen steadily through April and as of 23 April there are now more than 854 cases of pneumonia from the capital. Of those, 59 have died.

In San Luis Potosi, in central Mexico, 24 cases of ILI, with three deaths, have been reported. And from Mexicali, near the border with the United States, four cases of ILI, with no deaths, have been reported.

Of the Mexican cases, 18 have been laboratory confirmed in Canada as Swine Influenza A/H1N1, while 12 of those are genetically identical to the Swine Influenza A/H1N1 viruses from California.

Because there are human cases associated with an animal influenza virus, and because of the geographical spread of multiple community outbreaks, plus the somewhat unusual age groups affected, these events are of high concern.
Should we be alarmed? Maybe. Should we be concerned enough to monitor the situation? Definitely.

I hereby volunteer to facilitate that monitoring by posting frequent updates about this topic here on VirtualScratchpad.com.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Song of Pele

Pele, the Hawaiian volcano goddess, sings a continuous chorus beneath the surface of the Earth. Geophysicist Milton Garces uses infrasonic technology to listen in on what's happening in Kilauea's lava tubes.

From the "Kilauea: Mountain of Fire" episode on the PBS series, Nature.



If the video does not play or display properly above, click here to view it on YouTube.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Control-A-Cat: I need this!

Control-A-CatHere's a gadget that would really be useful, if only it worked - a remote control device called Control-A-Cat*.


Imagine pressing a button to get your cat to purr or show affection, or to stop hissing or attacking. Click: get off the chair. Click: purr louder. Click: eject fur ball.

And note the handy meow mute button - great for those mornings when kitty is ready for breakfast and you are not!

The marketing blurb for this gizmo promises, "...you'll be in control in no time. It's finally your turn to make your cat do what you want." Yeah, right.

So then why do the instructions include these two items?
  • Point at subject, press button, hope for the best
  • No batteries required - powered by wishful thinking
But heck, it's only $7.99 - [Add to cart]

*NB: Link goes to the ThinkGeek.com website, where you can actually purchase this thing! Link is for reference only; I'm neither benefiting from nor promoting its sale.